I was fortunate enough to attend a one-day seminar in Philadelphia earlier this year put on by Edward Tufte, Professor Emeritus at Yale University. The $380 fee included four of Dr. Tufte’s books. I would estimate that about 1,000 people (!) attended the seminar the same day I did. I would recommend the seminar and the books to anyone who wants to communicate better or understand the dynamics of good communication.
Most of us attend meetings and presentations as part of our jobs. Many of us are asked at one time or another to present something – or to be consumers of other people’s presentations. What are the elements of an effective presentation? What follows are my interpretations of Dr. Tufte’s thoughts from the seminar and from his book Beautiful Evidence.
Your Job as Presenter
When you present, you have a story to tell. Don’t lose sight of your story. When you are finished, your audience should have no doubt about what your story was. Next comes the question, “Have I presented convincing evidence that my story should be believed?” As a presenter, you are responsible for the intellectual and moral integrity of your presentation. To be believed, you must “do your homework” and honestly communicate the findings. And as a listener, you are responsible for understanding what the story is and to evaluate its believability.
What is the best way to communicate information? Naturally, there is no easy answer. Dr. Tufte suggested: "Whatever it takes" – meaning, “Do whatever it takes to convey the story and don’t restrict yourself to one type of data or one style of presentation.” A simple approach is to simply do a ‘high-resolution data dump’ followed by a discussion of it. Said another way, “Put the information out, then ‘hold a press conference.’" As an example, if the meeting is about improving sales, the meeting might begin with the distribution of some meaningful reports (homework!) and after a few minutes to time allotted to digest the information, a discussion is held on what the data means and what can be done. One more thing: People will be amazed if you finish early.
Notice how different this approach is from presenting a series of PowerPoint slides. The typical “PowerPoint style” of presentation has many faults, most notably that the presenter has dictatorial control over how the topic is covered, not only the content, but also the pace. As Dr. Tufte says, “(PowerPoint) presentations too often resemble a school play: very loud, very slow, and very simple.” Aggressive managers interrupt presentations like this, stop them, and almost always the meeting is better for it.
Onto some sound principles for telling your story:
Principles of Analysis and Presentation of Data
1. Show comparisons, contrasts, differences – When we are analyzing any question, we always want to know, “Compared to what?” If we are going to use a visual tool to make our point, we should show it next to something we want to compare it to.
2. Show causality, mechanism, explanation, systematic structure – As we are making our point, we also want to be teaching or explaining about “Why it is so.” For example, if we wanted to show sagging truss sales, we could also show them in light of housing starts, or mortgage rates, or whatever we think provides a possible connection.
3. Show multivariate data; that is, show more than 1 or 2 variables – This is a real challenge because we have so few role models to emulate. A few examples – the baseball statistics in the Sports Section of your newspaper. There a dozens of statistics tracked for both teams and individuals and we each consume those numbers in our own way. Also, each reader will also draw their own conclusions from the same set of numbers. (That’s OK!) Another example is a road map, which shows routes, terrain, population, distance and may other forms of data. Maps, perfected over hundreds of years, show a wonderful variety of data and have almost no “fluff.” (You can tell fluff by asking, “If I left this out, would any meaning or understandability be lost?”)
4. Completely integrate words, numbers, images, diagrams – This means that we place different types of information together, rather than segregating them. On a truss layout, we know the value of labeling everything right on the layout. Tables on the side of the layout are “second best” and should be avoided except to show summaries.
5. Thoroughly describe the evidence. Provide a detailed title, indicate the authors and sponsors, document the data sources, show complete measurement scales, point out the relevant issues. This documents the evidence, and provides the basis for the intellectual and moral integrity of the presentation.
6. Analytical presentations ultimately stand or fall depending on the quality, relevance, and integrity of their content. This suggests that the best way to improve a presentation is to improve the content – make it more substantial. Has the content of the presentation contributed to the questions it seeks to address?
Some examples of presenting multivariate data - completely unrelated to components: World History, How to Look at Modern Art, Napoleon’s Winter Campaign, More…